A lot has changed in the last three decades: hairstyles, technology, popular music. Another change? There’s been a move – especially since the start of the failed war on drugs, also in the early 1980s – for criminal law reform. Over-incarceration, glaring racial disparities in our criminal legal system, and little accountability for law enforcement officials have provoked conversations about repealing mandatory minimums, ending cash bail, and creating transparency in DA offices. Nationally, new district attorneys in Philadelphia, Chicago, St. Louis County are rethinking the so-called “tough-on-crime” policies. In Massachusetts, polled voters broadly agree that the Commonwealth needs to fix its criminal justice system. Fewer than half said they think the state’s criminal justice system is working, with huge majorities believing that it works differently for different people.

The voter turnout on primary day – from Boston to the Berkshires – shows that when voters are given a real choice on the ballot and given the information they need about candidates’ records and positions, they will get involved and show up at the polls. In fact, there was a 35 percent increase in ballots cast for DA in Suffolk County, a 16 percent increase in Middlesex County, and a 123 percent increase in Berkshire County.

We’re proud that the “What a Difference a DA Makes” campaign has contributed to a meaningful conversation about the enormous power DAs wield and how best to hold them accountable to the communities they serve. But the work doesn’t stop with the primary election: Again in November, voters will have the opportunity to send a clear message of support for a criminal legal system that works for everyone.

District attorneys are accountable only to us – the public and voters. There’s a lot we can do to hold them accountable to the values that matter to us: We can court watch, write letters to the editor to alert neighbors to DA decisions, demand transparency, request community meetings, and engage our neighbors in action. But most importantly, a fairer criminal legal system begins with our vote for district attorney.

For the first time since 1982, residents in the five contested Massachusetts districts – and many of the uncontested districts – are involved in a public discussion about where district attorney candidates – and incumbents – stand on issues of over- incarceration, racial disparities, mandatory minimums, cash bail, transparency, and more.

To learn more about who’s on your ballot this November, click here.

District attorneys have the power to change the system, and voters have the power to change district attorneys.

Written by Rahsaan Hall, director of the ACLU of Massachusetts’ Racial Justice Program, and campaign manager for the What a Difference a DA Makes campaign.

 

Date

Monday, September 17, 2018 - 9:00am

Featured image

WADADAM DA Email Banner Burgundy

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

25

Style

Standard with sidebar

Enrolling in Smith College a year ago was a dream come true. But rarely has a dream so swiftly turned into a nightmare. As I begin my sophomore year, I’m returning to a new slate of classes and to unsettling memories that I wish I could shake.

This summer, I was racially profiled — an all-too-common experience for Black people in America. But unlike most people who are targeted for simply existing in their skin, my story of harassment went viral.

It happened on July 31, when I was working on campus for a program that encourages high school girls to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). I was proud to remain on school grounds instead of taking a full summer vacation like many of my peers. As the first person in my family to attend college, every moment at a prestigious institution like Smith was a reminder that my mother's hard work had paid off.

The day didn't seem different than any other. I headed into the building’s common room to set my belongings down, and then went into the cafeteria to grab lunch. Eating on campus might seem like a typical student activity. But as a Black student, I received a familiar look of suspicion from a college employee who questioned my presence in the dining hall line as I began to fix myself a plate.

I was greeted by a woman: “You’re not supposed to eat here,” she said.

I informed her of the mentorship program I work for and offered to get my card to prove it. She then allowed me to go on my way.

But the the employee apparently wasn’t satisfied. As I was sitting in common room, I noticed a man pacing by the glass doors. Soon he was joined by the same woman who had approached me as I was fixing my plate. The two of them, both white, whispered to each other as I sat on the other side of the glass, wondering what was happening.

A few moments later, I looked up to see the same man who’d been pacing outside the door now approaching me, this time with a police officer. My anxiety was overwhelming. I had gone from a 20-year-old eating a meal on her own campus to the subject of a police interrogation. In my fear, I prayed and tried to remain calm — and pressed record on my cell phone.

“We’re wondering why you’re here,” said the police officer. He was on the scene, he said, because I had been described as “out of place” and demonstrating “suspicious behavior.”

A few humiliating minutes later, the questioning was over. But the pain certainly wasn't. As I write this, I still feel overwhelmed with anxiety and sadness over what happened. I still struggle to leave my room. Walking into the dining hall to grab a meal fills me with dread.

I am one of many Americans who have been targeted by racially biased calls to the police, treated like a potential criminal for the act of “living while Black.” This everyday form of racial profiling isn’t only happening to people sitting peacefully at a Starbucks or checking out of an Airbnb. From Yale, to Colorado State University, to Smith, racism is also prevalent on the very college campuses that claim to be safe spaces. These incidents are being captured on cellphones, thanks to a younger generation that is tech-savvy — but also scared.

It wasn't too long ago that students like me couldn't even sleep in the dorms on a college campus like Smith. I find myself thinking about Otelia Cromwell, who in 1900 became Smith's first Black graduate. Otelia wasn't allowed to live on campus. Her legacy, along with incidents like mine, remind us of the significant work still required to address the systems that tell us that we don’t belong.

Attending Smith College has helped me realize my dreams and purpose in life. It has also shown me that unity and visibility are important. First-generation students and students of color should know that they belong and deserve to thrive in a society that often tells them otherwise. I am deeply hurt by what happened, but also determined to make it doesn’t happen to anyone else.

To that end, I am using this platform to make demands of the college that I love. Among them are a call for Smith College to adopt new policies and training that address race and gender — including policies that improve how law enforcement officers navigate incidents like mine. 

I also demand that Smith take more steps to address the history of Black students and the school’s legacy of institutional racism. I want a more fitting commemoration of Otelia Cromwell. I want an examination of the racism that shows up in the naming of campus buildings. I want concrete action taken to provide affinity housing for students of color.

Most of all, I want a campus where hard-working students are never told that they are “out of place.”

Date

Thursday, September 13, 2018 - 4:30pm

Featured image

Oumou Kanoute

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Racial Justice

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

25

Style

Standard with sidebar

Did you know that the Worcester Police Department (WPD) is using cameras, automatic license plate readers and other surveillance equipment in our communities? WPD implemented these technologies without a single public hearing to allow the public to understand or approve their use. We demand accountability.

Join us on Thursday, September 20 at 6:30 p.m. to learn how you can help win community control over police surveillance.

Without proper oversight, these tools threaten our civil rights and liberties – especially those of Muslim, immigrant, and Black and Brown people. Local law enforcement agencies across Massachusetts have already been shown to unjustly target our immigrant and Muslim neighbors and more aggressively police communities of color. 

The community should have a voice in determining how police use invasive surveillance technology and military equipment in Worcester. The people most impacted by these technologies need to have a seat at the table.

We have a plan to gain community oversight over police surveillance, but we can’t do it without your help.

We hope to see you there!

Event Date

Thursday, September 20, 2018 - 6:30pm to
7:30pm

Featured image

More information / register

Venue

Park View Room

Address

230 Park Avenue
2nd Floor
Worcester, MA 01609
United States

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Date

Thursday, September 20, 2018 - 7:30pm

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU Massachusetts RSS