One year ago, artist Hank Willis Thomas unveiled his sculpture, "The Embrace," honoring the legacies of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Coretta Scott King. The work stands as a celebration of the couple’s historical significance — but also an enduring commitment to advancing racial justice within the city of Boston.
King is widely renowned, of course, but “The Embrace” offers us a more intimate perspective on the activist's life — one that forgoes the usual hagiography in favor of humanity. Although its sheer size highlights King’s significant historical impact, it also embodies his vision of a “beloved community,” celebrating bonds that range from the interpersonal all the way to the global. King knew that we are defined not just by individual achievements, but by the relationships we build.
These are the roots of community-driven organizing, action, and solidarity that shaped King’s formative years and professional journey. King himself was shaped by his environment, by the people that loved him and inspired him. For example, his father, Martin Luther King Sr., who provided a model of ministerial work and dedication to community activism, or his college mentor, Benjamin Mays, or the ministers he succeeded at Twelfth Baptist Church in Roxbury, Massachusetts, and throughout Montgomery, Alabama, where he eventually moved.
It’s easy to read this list of famous locals and consign them to the realm of myth, to think that we’ll never see the likes of King of his milieu ever again. It’s so easy to forget how ordinary these places were, and are. The same hopes and dreams that animated King and his friends, neighbors, and contemporaries are still alive today in Roxbury, in Brockton, in Springfield, and Pittsfield. And if you don’t believe me, I invite you to come knock on a few doors.
Last year, our Racial Justice Program launched a new campaign called BIPOC to the Ballot Box to engage and energize registered voters in cities and towns with large and growing communities of color. Over the course of 2023, our Action Team volunteers held over 2,800 conversations with both dedicated and disillusioned voters across Massachusetts, each interaction providing an invaluable opportunity to hear about the various hopes and frustrations of community members. We heard concerns ranging from constraints on free speech to voter suppression, to government surveillance, to book banning and overzealous policing. And as we reflect on the first year of this campaign in light of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we can’t help but be reminded of the historic tactics of government-led discrimination and suppression that animated the Civil Rights Movement — because it’s so clear these problems still plague us today.
But if the problems still plague us, so too does the spirit of King and his compatriots live within us. We've consistently seen this in recent times, with some of the largest popular movements in this nation’s history. We saw it in 2020, when thousands rallied from Roxbury's Nubian Square to the State House under the #BlackLivesMatter movement, unified in condemnation of the tragic deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd at the hands of law enforcement. And we saw it in 2022, when grandmothers, mothers, and their daughters alike protested the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade on the cusp of its 50th anniversary. And we see it in our communities’ vigorous efforts to preserve the very memory and history of King’s struggle in the face of cynical, politically motivated censorship. Diversity in education serves as an intellectual, social, and cultural foundation for the many civil liberties we tirelessly fight for. The banning of books across the nation — standing at a record high for both introduced and passed legislation in 2023 — serves as a major bellwether for the health of our democracy.
It’s inspiring and invigorating to remember campaigns like these — just as it’s inspiring to read about King. But MLK Day is about more than re-reading his most celebrated works and venerating the man himself. The holiday is best observed as a day of service, and what better way to honor the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement in the upcoming election year than by volunteering to inspire the next generation of voters. Help us build a powerful team of activists!
King was more than just a great orator, writer, and scholar; he was a relationship builder, an organizer, an activist — and that’s something we all have the power to do. If you want to give it a shot, our BIPOC to the Ballot Box campaign is preparing for the upcoming election, and the ACLU of Massachusetts Action Team could always use some new members.
What is the Action Team?
The ACLU of Massachusetts Action Team is powered by volunteers working in their local communities and at the state level to protect and expand civil rights and civil liberties.
If you are looking to advocate for civil rights and civil liberties but don’t know where to start, the Action Team is the perfect place for you!
Learn More!
Date
Thursday, January 11, 2024 - 12:15pm
Featured image
Show featured image
Hide banner image
Override default banner image
Related issues
Racial Justice
Free Speech and Expression
Voting Rights
Show related content
Tweet Text
[node:title]
Share Image
Type
Menu parent dynamic listing
Show PDF in viewer on page
Style
Centered single-column (no sidebar)
Show list numbers
“Those who have no record of what their forebears have accomplished lose the inspiration which comes from the teaching of biography and history.”
― Carter G. Woodson
Historian Carter G. Woodson’s words seem prophetic when, today, a vocal minority seeks to bury the truth of our history and squash the inspiration needed to persevere in such dire times.
Woodson, the so-called “Father of Black History,” created the precursor to Black History Month when he launched the celebration of Negro History Week in 1926. In the 1960s, Black History Month was recognized by cities, towns, universities, and schools around the country, and every president since 1976 has honored the celebration. For so many, February is about recognizing the accomplishments and contributions of Black Americans while planning for a future where equality and civil rights are inherent parts of our everyday lives. We are still working towards that future.
The ACLU of Massachusetts’ Racial Justice Program is continuing its work to dismantle systems of inequality in our schools, our health care, our democracy — and fighting those who seek to violate the civil liberties of the marginalized.
We work against book bans in our schools that seek to silence BIPOC and LGBTQ+ voices, thus violating the rights of all students to learn. We work in coalition with our partners to eliminate health disparities in Black maternal health outcomes. We fight to end racist policing and to eliminate racial inequities in every stage of our criminal legal system. And our BIPOC to the Ballot Box initiative gives voice to the frustrations of BIPOC voters in communities with large and growing BIPOC populations but little BIPOC elected representation.
Black History Month is a time to recognize that our commitment to equity extends beyond a single month and beyond a single issue area. From voting rights to free expression to policing to reproductive justice, we fight the battle against systemic inequities every day. During this month dedicated to hearing Black voices, we hope that the stories told, the awareness gained, and the discussions ignited serve to fortify us all for the coming fights.
Let us remain committed in our dedication to upholding the rights of all people. Now more than ever, we must stand up and demand equality; we must honor and celebrate our differences. We must be resolute in our ongoing commitment to creating a Commonwealth where equity becomes the norm.
“I am ready to act, if I can find brave men to help me.”
― Carter G. Woodson
Date
Thursday, February 1, 2024 - 2:30am
Featured image
Show featured image
Hide banner image
Override default banner image
Related issues
Racial Justice
Voting Rights
Free Speech and Expression
Show related content
Tweet Text
[node:title]
Share Image
Type
Menu parent dynamic listing
Show PDF in viewer on page
Style
Centered single-column (no sidebar)
Show list numbers
Automatic license plate reader technology is unregulated in Massachusetts—and it implicates civil liberties.
What is an automatic license plate reader?
Automatic license plate readers (“ALPR”) enable private companies and government agencies to keep track of where people drive and when. The technology uses special cameras that are either mounted to stationary locations like traffic lights or affixed to moveable objects like cars and trucks. These cameras capture images of license plates and convert them to text files using optical character recognition technology. The original image, text file, and associated metadata such as date, time, and geographic coordinates are then added to a database. These databases are used by private industries like insurance, towing, and repossession to locate cars and perform investigations. They are also used by police departments to conduct dragnet surveillance of motorists.
How do police use license plate readers?
Police primarily use ALPRs in two ways: to track cars in real time and to track the past locations of cars. When police seek to find a particular car in real time, they can add information about that car to an ALPR list maintained by their department or another agency. These lists, sometimes called “vehicle of interest” lists or “hot lists,” are generated, aggregated, and shared by agencies like local police departments, the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division, and more. The lists can include stolen cars, cars associated with Amber Alerts, and other vehicles of interest to police. When a car on one of these lists passes by a license plate reader, it generates an alert, also known as a “hit.” Depending on how an ALPR system is configured, a hit notification can be sent to an individual police officer or entire department for follow-up action.
Automatic license plate readers are also used to track the past locations of vehicles, enabling dragnet surveillance of millions of people. Police departments and intelligence agencies can access stored ALPR data dating back years in government and private company databases. One private company, Vigilant Solutions, boasts that its license plate reader database has billions of records of motorists’ movements, collected from states across the country. Police can pay to access these records on a subscription basis. Police can also collect their own ALPR data, which they can share with other government agencies and even private companies.
Some states have passed laws limiting how long police can retain license plate reader data and how they can share it and use it. In Massachusetts, lawmakers have filed ALPR legislation for many years, but to date, the technology remains entirely unregulated at the state level.
Why should I be concerned about police use of license plate readers?
This technology impacts several civil liberties—from freedom of expression and association to freedom from unfettered surveillance, from protecting the privacy of people seeking abortion care in Massachusetts to defending the rights of immigrants across the country. In recent years, for example:
- The Virginia state police used license plate readers to track people’s attendance at political events;
- The New York Police Department used license plate readers to keep track of who visited certain places of worship, and how often;
- Federal immigration authorities bought license plate reader data and used it to track immigrants across the country.
The need for the public to have detailed information regarding this technology has become even more important after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade. With several states banning or severely limiting abortion, ALPR technology now poses a greater privacy threat. Police and private individuals in some states may seek location data showing people traveling to Massachusetts for reproductive care in order to use that evidence for civil and criminal penalties.
Despite all this surveillance, ALPR technology has been repeatedly shown to be unreliable; like other police technologies, ALPRs can and do make mistakes. Use of ALPRs by law enforcement across the country has been tainted with high error rates and improper identification of purportedly stolen vehicles. On multiple occasions, people have been traumatized after police pulled guns on them at traffic stops, relying on faulty data from license plate reader systems. Here in Massachusetts, the use of the technology has been marred by years of inaccurate timestamp data.
Is this technology regulated?
There is currently no statute in Massachusetts regulating police use of ALPRs.
In 2020, the state Supreme Judicial Court recognized that Massachusetts’ use of this technology could implicate constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Specifically, the court noted that “[w]ith enough cameras in enough locations, the historic location data from an ALPR system in Massachusetts would invade a reasonable expectation of privacy and would constitute a search for constitutional purposes.”
In December 2022, the ACLU filed a public records lawsuit against the Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security and the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services to obtain information about the state’s ALPR programs.
Date
Monday, December 12, 2022 - 6:15pm
Featured image
Show featured image
Hide banner image
Related issues
Privacy and Surveillance
Police Accountability
Show related content
Tweet Text
[node:title]
Share Image
Type
Menu parent dynamic listing
Show PDF in viewer on page
Style
Standard with sidebar
Show list numbers
Pages
What is the Action Team?
