Commonwealth v. Forlizzi
The ACLU brief argues that state ethics rules required prosecutors to seek court approval before secretly obtaining four years' worth of bank records for the defendant's attorney.
For more than one hundred years, ACLU lawyers have been at the center of one history-making court case after another, participating in more Supreme Court cases than any other private organization.
This page highlights current and important ACLU of Massachusetts cases, and provides ways to sort and search for other casework.
The ACLU brief argues that state ethics rules required prosecutors to seek court approval before secretly obtaining four years' worth of bank records for the defendant's attorney.
The Supreme Judicial Court unanimously affirmed that the government must have specific information that a cellphone contains evidence of a crime before it can search or seize the device.
These defendants were convicted of assault and battery on the basis of diagnoses of Shaken Baby Syndrome--but since the mid-1980s, studies have been published that cast doubt on the theory that SBS can only...
Does the "necessity defense" apply to homeless people who trespass to survive bitter cold?